CCQ: A New Frontier in Extreme Low‑bit Quantization for LLMs

ic_writer ds66
ic_date 2024-11-11
blogs

Table of Contents

  1. Introduction

  2. The Quantization Challenge in LLMs

  3. Why Go Below 4‑bit?

  4. Existing Quantization Methods: Scalar & Vector

  5. CCQ: Convolutional Code Quantization Explained

  6. Key Innovations in CCQ

  • Bit‑shift encoding

  • Hardware‑aware optimization

  • Hybrid encoding

  • Code cluster

Lookup‑Free Encoding Space

Balancing Accuracy and Efficiency

Practical Workflow: Compressing DeepSeek‑V3

Compressing ERNIE‑4.5‑300B‑A47B to 89 GB

Benchmarks: Accuracy vs. Bit‑Width

Inference Performance Gains

Single‑GPU Deployment

Eliminating Inter‑Card Communication

Open‑Source Release for ERNIE 4.5‑300B

Implications for Adoption and Accessibility

Limitations and Fail‑Safe Considerations

Future Research Directions

Broader Impact on AI Infrastructure

Conclusion

1. Introduction

Large Language Models (LLMs) have driven major advances in natural-language understanding but at a steep inference cost. Traditional quantization methods reduce this cost but degrade performance below 3‑bit precision. CCQ (Convolutional Code Quantization) introduces a breakthrough 2.0–2.75‑bit quantization method, enabling high-accuracy LLM deployment at extreme low-bit settings 🚀.

54766_cjmb_9379.jpeg

2. The Quantization Challenge in LLMs

Quantization shrinks model size by mapping high-precision weights to fewer bits per parameter. Typical targets:

  • FP16 → 8‑bit: modest performance loss

  • 4‑bit: still acceptable

  • Below 3‑bit: serious degradation due to quantization errors

Maintaining accuracy while going extremely low‑bit is difficult.

3. Why Go Below 4‑bit?

Moving from 4‑bit to 2‑bit offers dramatic advantages:

  • 2× smaller model size

  • Half the memory bandwidth

  • Potential single‑GPU deployment for huge LLMs

  • Lower energy consumption

Yet performance must remain competitive.

4. Existing Quantization Methods: Scalar & Vector

Existing methods include:

  • Scalar Quantization (SQ): simple, speedy, but high error in low bits

  • Vector Quantization (VQ): groups data into learned codebooks—more accurate but slower and memory-heavy

Neither performs well below 3‑bit without notable accuracy loss.

5. CCQ: Convolutional Code Quantization Explained

CCQ merges traditional error-correcting Convolutional Code techniques with quantization. It includes:

  • Bit-shift encoding: hardware-aware mapping using optimized weight-bit transitions

  • Convolutional Code: error-resistant encoding of quantized weights

  • Hybrid encoding: combines convolutional and scalar techniques per weight cluster

  • Code clustering: shared codebooks across parameter clusters

Together, CCQ compresses models to 2.0–2.75 bits with minimal accuracy impact.

6. Key Innovations in CCQ

Bit‑shift encoding

Enables hardware‑accelerated transforms, avoiding slow arithmetic operations.

Hardware‑aware design

Designed for linear mapping—no lookups, enabling SIMD/Eigen speed.

Hybrid encoding

Mixes convolutional and standard encoding per cluster to balance complexity.

Code cluster

Groups similar weights to reduce codebook size and simplify encoding.

7. Lookup‑Free Encoding Space

Instead of storing large lookup tables, CCQ uses direct linear transforms. This removes:

  • Cache misses

  • Memory slowdown

  • Quantization round-off errors

It's faster, leaner, and fits into existing inference engines more easily.

8. Balancing Accuracy and Efficiency

CCQ preserves precision by:

  • Using trained encoding maps per cluster

  • Adapting to weight distributions

  • Employing error-aware correction via convolutional codes

Accuracy tests show performance close to standard 8‑bit models even at 2‑bit quantization.

9. Practical Workflow: Compressing DeepSeek‑V3

DeepSeek‑V3 (671B) is reduced to 184 GB — matching 2‑bit precision. Benefits:

  • Enables deployment on high‑end servers

  • Drops inter-GPU overhead

  • Cuts energy and memory usage

10. Compressing ERNIE‑4.5‑300B‑A47B to 89 GB

ERNIE‑4.5‑300B‑A47B goes from ~300GB to 89GB (2‑bit CCQ). This size fits in a single A100 GPU, eliminating the need for model parallelism and multi-card communication.

11. Benchmarks: Accuracy vs. Bit‑Width

CCQ across tasks (LLM benchmarks, QA, summarization) shows:

  • 2.75‑bit models: within 0.5% of 8‑bit baseline

  • 2.0‑bit models: within 1–2%—acceptable for many use cases

  • CCQ outperforms other 2‑bit solutions by 5–10%

12. Inference Performance Gains

CCQ’s hardware-aware transforms yield:

  • 30–40% speedup vs. lookup‑based 4‑bit

  • 2‑bit models surpass 4‑bit performance

  • Memory footprint halved, enabling better cache utilization

13. Single‑GPU Deployment

Large LLMs (>100B) normally need multi-GPU parallelism. CCQ enables:

  • ERNIE‑4.5‑300B on one A100

  • Lower latency, reduced communication bottlenecks

  • Broader deployment options (data center racks, edge)

14. Eliminating Inter‑Card Communication

Without sub-group pipelines, CCQ eliminates:

  • Collective operations

  • Synchronization delays

  • Memory transfer overhead

This unlocks better scalability across data center and edge setups.

15. Open‑Source Release for ERNIE 4.5‑300B

The 2‑bit ERNIE‑4.5 model and optimized inference engine are publicly released. This allows researchers to run advanced models on single GPUs, democratizing access.

16. Implications for Adoption and Accessibility

CCQ:

  • Makes large LLMs accessible to smaller organizations

  • Reduces inference cost and infrastructure barriers

  • Supports on-premise and privacy-aware deployment

17. Limitations and Fail‑Safe Considerations

Potential drawbacks:

  • Approximate quantization may misstep in edge numeric tasks

  • Encoding training adds pipeline complexity

  • Requires hardware support for bit‑shifts

  • May involve slight retraining or calibration steps

18. Future Research Directions

Opportunities include:

  • Extending CCQ to activations and gradients

  • Combining CCQ with structured sparsity for further shrinkage

  • Automating cluster and codebook creation

  • Benchmarking across multimodal and retrieval‑augmented LLMs

19. Broader Impact on AI Infrastructure

CCQ’s success may lead to:

  • Widespread low-bit deployment

  • Rethink of LLM design for edge AI

  • New hardware optimizations for convolutional quantization

20. Conclusion

CCQ is a milestone in LLM quantization—achieving ultra-low-bit performance with minimal accuracy loss and inference overhead. By compressing ERNIE‑4.5‑300B to 2 bits and deploying it on a single GPU, CCQ proves that extreme quantization is both practical and scalable, ushering in a new era of efficient AI democratization.