KELPS: A New Era in Autoformalization of Mathematics with Multilingual Precision

ic_writer ds66
ic_date 2024-11-14
blogs

Table of Contents

  1. Introduction

  2. Background: The Need for Autoformalization in Modern Mathematics

  3. The Challenges of Multilingual Formalization

  4. Overview of KELPS: Bridging Natural and Formal Language

  5. Knowledge Equations (KEs): The Core of KELPS

  6. Semantic-Syntactic Alignment: Key to Verified Translation

  7. From KEs to Formal Theorem Provers: Lean, Coq, and Isabelle

  8. Data Generation and Parallel Corpus Creation

  9. Empirical Results: KELPS vs. DeepSeek-V3, Herald, and Others

  10. Evaluation on MiniF2F

  11. Comparison with State-of-the-Art Models

  12. Symbolic-Neural Synergy: How KELPS Combines the Best of Both Worlds

  13. Code Availability and Reproducibility

  14. Real-World Applications of KELPS

  15. Implications for Education and Knowledge Access

  16. Limitations and Future Directions

  17. Conclusion

1. Introduction

The formalization of mathematics is undergoing a revolution powered by artificial intelligence. Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in transforming informal, human-written mathematical statements into rigorously verified formal theorems. However, their success has largely been monolingual and constrained, often restricted to English and limited domains.

43556_vxpa_9717.jpeg

Enter KELPS — the Knowledge-Equation based Logical Processing System — a cutting-edge neuro-symbolic framework designed to take autoformalization to the next level. By introducing a new intermediate logical form, called Knowledge Equations (KEs), and focusing on multilingual, verified formalization, KELPS opens the door to a scalable and accurate system that bridges informal and formal mathematics.

2. Background: The Need for Autoformalization in Modern Mathematics

Modern mathematics, while rigorous in its core, is often written informally in natural language across books, papers, and educational materials. Translating these informal descriptions into formal proofs in theorem provers (like Coq, Lean, or Isabelle) is vital for:

  • Machine verification of mathematical claims

  • Building knowledge graphs for scientific discovery

  • Enhancing educational technologies

  • Enabling AI systems to reason about complex formal logic

Yet, manual formalization is slow, difficult, and error-prone. Even expert mathematicians struggle to formalize basic theorems. Hence, there's an urgent need for automatic, accurate, and language-agnostic tools.

3. The Challenges of Multilingual Formalization

While recent LLMs (e.g., GPT-4, DeepSeek-V3) can perform basic formalization in English, the problem becomes exponentially harder in a multilingual setting:

  • Lack of high-quality multilingual datasets

  • Variations in syntax and logical constructs across languages

  • Lack of consistency in how mathematical ideas are phrased

  • Different formal theorem provers (Lean vs Coq vs Isabelle) have different syntaxes

Most current systems fail to retain semantic integrity during translation, especially across languages. KELPS addresses this by introducing an intermediate, logic-grounded representation.

4. Overview of KELPS: Bridging Natural and Formal Language

KELPS is a multi-stage framework that processes informal mathematical statements and outputs their formal equivalents in multiple theorem proving languages. It works as follows:

  1. Translation: Convert natural language statements into Knowledge Equations (KEs) — a logic-based intermediate language.

  2. Synthesis: Use defined rules to transform KEs into formal representations in Lean, Coq, and Isabelle.

  3. Filtering: Discard invalid or ambiguous formalizations using symbolic logic checks.

This pipeline ensures both syntactic accuracy (valid code) and semantic preservation (correct meaning).

5. Knowledge Equations (KEs): The Core of KELPS

KEs are the heart of KELPS.

What are Knowledge Equations?

KEs are logic expressions rooted in assertional logic, a formal system designed to represent mathematical knowledge clearly. Each KE has:

  • A logical structure that encodes the assertion (e.g., ∀x ∈ ℕ, x + 0 = x)

  • Semantic tags that identify the type of mathematical object

  • Alignment hooks for converting to multiple formal languages

KEs act as a universal representation, enabling one-to-many translation from natural language to multiple formal languages.

6. Semantic-Syntactic Alignment: Key to Verified Translation

A major innovation in KELPS is its semantic-syntactic alignment mechanism. This involves:

  • Mapping natural language phrases to formal constructs (e.g., “there exists” → ∃)

  • Using contextual reasoning to resolve ambiguities (e.g., distinguishing between “a function” and “a function defined on X”)

  • Ensuring that each translated component maintains meaning fidelity across languages

This method allows for bidirectional mapping, enabling both formalization and de-formalization for explainability.

7. From KEs to Formal Theorem Provers: Lean, Coq, and Isabelle

Once a statement is represented in KE form, it can be translated into three major formal languages using rule-based transformations:

  • Lean (community-driven, highly expressive syntax)

  • Coq (widely used in software verification)

  • Isabelle/HOL (powerful higher-order logic prover)

Each target language has its own syntax and logic constructs, but KELPS ensures uniformity by:

  • Preserving operator precedence

  • Mapping quantifiers, assumptions, and types precisely

  • Ensuring formal statements are machine-verifiable

8. Data Generation and Parallel Corpus Creation

Using the KELPS framework, the authors generated a multilingual parallel corpus of:

  • ✅ 60,000+ formal-informal problem pairs

  • 🌍 Spanning multiple languages (including Chinese, Spanish, and French)

  • 🧠 Covering algebra, logic, calculus, and discrete mathematics

  • 🧪 Compatible with MiniF2F and other benchmark datasets

This corpus can be used to train and evaluate multi-language mathematical LLMs and is available open-source for community use.

9. Empirical Results: KELPS vs. DeepSeek-V3, Herald, and Others

On MiniF2F, a popular benchmark for math formalization:

  • KELPS achieved 88.9% pass@1 syntactic accuracy

  • This outperforms DeepSeek-V3 (81.0%), Herald (81.3%), and other top models

  • In multilingual settings, KELPS consistently produced valid and executable code

The authors also tested on formal verification tasks and code synthesis, where KELPS maintained robust performance.

10. Evaluation on MiniF2F

MiniF2F tests models on formalizing math competition problems. The key challenges are:

  • Complex reasoning

  • Informal-to-formal language mapping

  • Long input-output sequences

KELPS’s structured pipeline gives it a clear edge over purely neural models that hallucinate or misinterpret logic.

11. Comparison with State-of-the-Art Models

ModelMiniF2F Accuracy (Pass@1)Multilingual SupportFormal Language Output
KELPS88.9%✅ Full✅ Lean, Coq, Isabelle
DeepSeek-V381.0%Partial✅ Lean
Herald81.3%✅ Coq
GPT-4 (API)~85.2%✅ Partial❌ Inconsistent

KELPS proves that neuro-symbolic methods + multilingual grounding outperform monolithic LLMs.

12. Symbolic-Neural Synergy: How KELPS Combines the Best of Both Worlds

KELPS is not purely a neural model. It integrates:

  • 🤖 Neural models for understanding informal inputs

  • 📐 Symbolic systems for reasoning and logic validation

  • ⚙️ Rule-based systems for syntactic transformation

This hybrid approach leads to better:

  • Explainability

  • Verifiability

  • Multilingual generalization

13. Code Availability and Reproducibility

All code, datasets, and trained models are available via:

  • GitHub repository (link in the paper)

  • Pretrained KE-to-Coq/Lean models

  • Docker and Jupyter deployment options

  • API demo to test custom formalizations

This makes KELPS highly reproducible and extensible.

14. Real-World Applications of KELPS

  1. Mathematical Research: Autoformalizing papers for theorem verification

  2. Education: Generating quizzes and formal exercises from textbooks

  3. Multilingual STEM tools: Translate math for diverse global users

  4. AI theorem proving: Enhance proof assistants with automatic formalization

  5. Knowledge bases: Structuring math for querying and retrieval

15. Implications for Education and Knowledge Access

KELPS could democratize access to formal logic by:

  • Supporting non-English learners

  • Making math more rigorous and explorable

  • Enhancing platforms like Khan Academy, Wolfram Alpha, and ChatGPT plugins

  • Creating AI tutors capable of verified feedback

This could revolutionize mathematical education globally.

16. Limitations and Future Directions

While KELPS is groundbreaking, it has challenges:

  • ⚠️ Manual rule engineering is complex

  • 📉 Some ambiguous language inputs still fail

  • 🔣 Non-Latin script support is limited

  • 🧪 Needs deeper symbolic inference for long proofs

Future work includes:

  • MoE-based scaling of KELPS

  • Adding formal languages like HOL-Light, Agda, and Mizar

  • Integrating with LangChain and DeepSeek for RAG applications

17. Conclusion

KELPS represents a paradigm shift in the field of mathematics autoformalization. By introducing Knowledge Equations and combining symbolic reasoning with LLMs, KELPS achieves state-of-the-art performance, supports multiple languages, and lays the groundwork for verifiable AI mathematicians.

With strong results on challenging benchmarks, transparent design, and open-source availability, KELPS is poised to accelerate formal science, education, and global knowledge access.